The Emsisoft Internet Security Pack has received the Virusovnet High + award for the best detection rate from all of the test objects. This latest victory once more shows that the Emsisoft products stand out with their top detection rate and are capable to secure everyone’s computer reliably.

These are the complete test results with the overall detection rate in percent:

The final detection rates of Emsisoft Anti-Malware:

Behavior Blocker with unknown malware – 100%
File Guard – 100%
Surf protection & File Guard – 100%
Behavior Blocker – 100%

You can watch the video right here:

This is what Virus Bulletin writes: “Detection rates were excellent, with some stunning scores in the RAP sets – the proactive week was particularly impressive.”

X-axis shows proactive detection and Y-axis shows reactive detection.
The more in the top right corner the better the result; Emsisoft Anti-Malware is marked green here.

Emsisoft Anti-Malware has now taken the lead of the overall ranking for antivirus and antimalware programs in 2011 and therefore shows its enormous strength in the protection against new online threats. This is achieved by using the following three security layers:

• Surf protection which blocks the access to known malicious websites
• Dual-engine file guard with more than 5 million signatures of known malware
• Behavior blocker for zero-day malware nobdody was able to analyze yet

Victor’s overall result: “Emsisoft Anti-Malware is a software that offers excellent protection combined with low system resources usage.“

He shows the basic functions of the awarded security tool by confronting it with fresh malwares. In the end not a single threat was able to pass Emsisoft Anti-Malware. As usual you can watch the video right here:

The second video was created by winsevenholic who has done a lot of security reviews aswell. Accompanied by hard techno sounds he also visits various malware links with Emsisoft Anti-Malware 6 being active. He finally recommends Emsisoft Anti-Malware 6, because there was almost no impact on system resources with very fast updates plus scans and both great malware prevention and detection.

The result of the review:

Pros: Comprehensive and advanced firewall protection with a lot of additional security features but easy to use for even if you aren’t PC expert. Banking Online Mode is unique and very useful. It’s even more than a firewall program in comparison with others.

Cons: Not free but good price.

You can try the brand new Emsisoft Online Armor 5.1 version for free, download the setup file here.

Both programs were able to detect all threats which is a very good result that proves the great protection capabilities of Online Armor and Emsisoft Anti-Malware.

• Detect and remove malware software effectively.
• Automatic update several times per day ensuring effective detection and removal.
• No resource consuming.
• Easy to use, specially for non-technicians.

Emsisoft Anti-Malware
Excerpt: “So to sum it up, Emsisoft Anti-Malware has a user-friendly interface that’s so easy to use not even novices will have a problem with, does its job without impacting your computer’s performance, and offers proven, award-winning protection. What more would you want?”

Emsisoft Mamutu
Excerpt: “It has a nice, simple interface, it doesn’t hog system resources, and it provides behavior-based detection for a long list of security threats. Mamutu is a properly good security software solution for Windows users.”

Emsisoft Emergency Kit
Excerpt: “Advanced users who are constantly on the go and who have to deal with compromised computers will definitely want to get Emsisoft Emergency Kit. It is a collection of powerful tools that will help you remove malware infections from compromised machines. You can take the tools with you on an USB stick for example, and you can use them free of charge for as long as you want.”

MalAware
Excerpt: “The bottom line is that MalAware in an easy to use tool that doesn’t need to be installed. It will perform a quick scan of your system and inform you if it finds malware traces. It will not remove more than 5 malware traces and it will keep suggesting that you get Emsisoft Anti-Malware – which you should, if you want a properly good security tool to keep your system protected.”

Are you curious to try out Malaware right now? Then simply click the button below.

Softpedia
“Online Armor Premium is a hefty suite perfectly capable of keeping your data and system unaffected by malicious activity. All the modules are easy to configure and handle while system resources remain within normal limits. The protection it offers extends beyond what a regular firewall as it includes various working modes and lets you impose restricted permissions for specific software.”

Findmysoft
“Online Armor Premium is a top notch firewall that combines ease of use with adequate protection against hackers, phishing attempts, malicious programs, keyloggers and other security threats.”

• Strong core firewall
• Very configurable
• Doesn’t demand too many system resources
• Difficult for malware to disable
• Lots of bonus features

Final result of the test: Online Armor received 4.5/5 stars! You can find the complete review here.

The detection results for Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1 are stunning:

With a total detection rate of 98.4% across all categories and 99.7% in the special Backdoors/Bots category it would have ranked place 3 of 22 world class antivirus products, and qualifying for the Antivirus Standard logo.

That again confirms that Emsisoft Anti-Malware benefits of its dual scan engine and we’re working hard to improve it even more for upcoming tests. Additionally we’re currently investigating on the outlined false positive issue.

The complete article can be found here.

Even though the video is done in Portuguese, English subtitles can be activated with the “CC” button of Youtube. In the end victorh2007 “highly recommends” Emsisoft Anti-Malware, as it was able to block all used threats. Watch the video now to see Emsisoft Anti-Malware in action.

“Emsisoft Anti-Malware 6.0 is easy to install and easy to use. If you need ultimate protection from a wide range of online threats, go with this great tool and you won’t be disappointed!“

The tests were based on a Windows 7 32 Ultimate virtual machine with all updates, of course every single application got its own VM. Samples came directly from MRG honeypots and were then uploaded to a certain URL so that it could be downloaded to the VM by using Internet Explorer.

The final results:

Once again Emsisoft Anti-Malware was able to proof its great detection rate together with Defense Wall V3. It is very interesting that well established programs like Kaspersky Antivirus 2011, AVG Antivirus or Avira Antivir Premium show strong weaknesses in detecting current threats. You can find the complete test here.

Virus Bulletin tests all kinds of anti virus programs multiple times a year as a neutral authority. The probands have to detect unexceptional all samples of a wild list and may not give a single false alert while scanning about 400.000 normal files. Therefore the VB100 Award is a decoration that is very hard to obtain and so only a few first-class security tools receive it.

“Compatible with Windows 7” software:

• Is tested for compatibility and reliability on Windows 7.
• Passed Microsoft designed tests to minimize the possibility of crashes, hangs, and reboots.
• Represents a commitment that the product will continue to work over the life of Windows 7.
• Meets privacy standards set forth by the Anti-Spyware Coalition.
• Installs cleanly and reliably.
• Eliminates unnecessary reboots.
• Ensures compatibility with Windows 7, both 32-bit and 64-bit editions.

Similar to the “Compatible with Windows 7″ tests, Online Armor has got the “Works with Windows Vista” logo too:

Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.0 achieved 98/100 points and therefore a ”very good“. Only for performance and usablity there was a single point discount. For this reason the Austrian tool received the best outcome at all on this website.

Conclusion of the autor:  ”From our point of view the best anti-virus scanner on the market. Whoever wants to be totally safe gets the best detection rates with Emsisoft Anti-Malware. The basic functions are easy to use by laymen and for experts there are a lot of advanced options. We give an unlimited purchase recommendation.”

You can find the complete test here (German).

1) When the installer is downloaded via Internet Explorer
2) During an on demand scan of the installer
3) When the PUA is installed by executing the installer
4) On execution of the PUA itself

Four different unwanted applications were used: Adware Bot, Anti Spyware , Registry Clear, Error Smart.

Out of 18 standalone Anti-Malware applications only six detected all of these four. And the winners are:

Emsisoft Anti-Malware
BluePoint Security
Eset Nod32 Antivirus
Panda Antivirus
PC Tools Spyware Doctor
Prevx

The complete article can be found here.

The result differs a bit from most of the tests we have seen:

1st place: Comodo Internet Security 5.0
2nd place: G-DATA AntiVirus 2011
3rd place: Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.0
4th place: BitDefender AntiVirus 2011
5th place: F-Secure AntiVirus 2011
6th place: Vipre AntiVirus 4.0
7th place: Kaspersky AntiVirus 2011
8th place: ESET NOD32 AntiVirus 4.2
9th place: Avira AntiVir Personal 10
10th place: Panda AntiVirus 2011
11th place: Microsoft Security Essentials 2 beta
12th place: AVG AntiVirus 9.0 Free
13th place: Avast! Free 5.0
14th place: Norton AntiVirus 2011
15th place: Rising AntiVirus 2010 Free

Read the complete article here (PDF).

• HotKeysHook Keylogger (9 / 10)
• TDL3 Rootkit (8 / 11)
• TDSS Dropper (3 / 16)
• FakeAV Trojan (3 / 16)
• Zbot Trojan (7 / 12)
• FakeAlert Trojan ( 7 / 12)
• VLogger Trojan (5 / 14)
• Neeris Worm (8 / 11)
• “Here You Have” Email Worm (19 / 0)
• Zbot Trojan retest (12 / 7)

Within the brackets you can see how many programs passed or failed the detection test. As all malware files were the latest variants with a severe risk level the result is really harrowing. Even known and established tools like Kaspersky, Gdata or Norton were not able to detect all samples. Just one single program was able to stop 100% of the threats: Emsisoft Anti-Malware.

He visits some suspicious websites and downloads several files to test the security level of the firewall including the “RunSafer” function. As this procedure can be considered as a normal usage scenario, it proves the effectivity of Online Armor ++.

Watch the complete video here:

The testing criteria to achieve the treasured VB100 certificate belong to the hardest worldwide. Exactly 100% of the up to date wildlist Malware files (right now 9.118 samples) have to be detected and not a single false alert may occur while scanning about 400.000 normal files.

In the test of August 2010 Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.0 got its first VB100 ever!

Excerpt of the test details:  ”In the infected sets, scores were truly splendid across the board.”

The 500 samples strong first set’s winner is Emsisoft Anti-Malware with a clean 100% detection – just Avira was able to detect all the threats aswell, while all the other products detected 9x% or even less.

Obviously the 5000 samples strong set 2 was more difficult for the security programs, as none was able to detect 100% here. But again Emsisoft Anti-Malware achieved the best result with 99.72%, in front of Avira Premium (99.22%), Twister (99%) and Kaspersky (98.48%). Surprisingly some very well known programs showed really bad performances like Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware (3%) or Ad-Aware (58.44%).

Thanks for this very interesting test where once again Emsisoft Anti-Malware proved it is the current number one in Malware detection. Read the complete article with all the results here.

For the first time since a longer period, Emsisoft Anti-Malware did not place first in a detection test, but second out of 30 is still a very good result.

The top 15:

The complete results and more detailed information can be found here.

“Compatible with Windows 7” software:

• Is tested for compatibility and reliability on Windows 7.
• Passed Microsoft designed tests to minimize the possibility of crashes, hangs, and reboots.
• Represents a commitment that the product will continue to work over the life of Windows 7.
• Meets privacy standards set forth by the Anti-Spyware Coalition.
• Installs cleanly and reliably.
• Eliminates unnecessary reboots.
• Ensures compatibility with Windows 7, both 32-bit and 64-bit editions.

On demand scan:

• Wildlist: 99.95% (actually a bunch of virut replications were not detected)
• Worms & bots: 99.81% (rank 4 out of 60)
• Polymorphic viruses: 78.59%
• Trojans: 98.29%
• False positives: 1

Reactive and proactive (RAP) detection:

• week-3: 99.13%
• week-2: 99.42%
• week-1: 97.92%
• Reactive average: 98.72% (that’s the best score of all 60 tested products!)
• Proactive week+1: 71.30%
• Overall average: 91.87%

Here are the test results:

a-squared Anti-Malware and Online Armor ++ are sharing the first place and had exactly the same results. Which was expected, because both products are using the same scanner technology. Realtime analysis components like the behavior blocker of Anti-Malware had not been tested.

Check out the full report describing the test methodology in detail.

Interesting side note: 5 of the 20 tested files were new and unknown to the signature based detection, but the behavior blocker cought all of them!

Both the static signature and dynamic behaviour analysis tests were taken into account – with a great total detection rate of 99,96% we got the PCSL Excellent Award 2009.

Excerpt of the results:
1) Emsisoft 99,96%
2)  TrustPort 99,90%
3) Kaspersky 99,84%
4) GDATA 99,83%
5) Sophos 99,67%
6) F-secure 99,61%
7) Panda 99,59%
8) Microsoft 99,57%
9) Jiangmin 99,48%

The reviewed products:

a-squared Anti-Malware 4.5.0.27
AntiVir Premium 9.0.0.452
Bluepoint Security 1.0.0.83
Hitman Pro 3.5.3 Build 80
Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware 1.42
Prevx 3.0.5.23
SUPERAntiSpyware Professional 4.31.1000

As test systems a freshly installed Windows XP with Service Pack 3 and all updates was used. With cloned images including Internet access every program got its own seperate Windows with all real time protection features being enabled and of course the lates updates. A folder containing 1000 different Trojans, Backdoors, Worms, Rogues, Spyware and Viruses then was scanned by right clicking it. Those samples had a maximum age of one month.

Result of the on demand test:

Note: Hitman Pro uses signatures from multiple programs, including a-squared

For the infected system rescue test again Windows Xp with Service Pack 3 was used. The tested programs were installed with standard options and deactivated real time protection here. Then 15 malware samples were executed individually, with the system being rebooted after each execution, until all fifteen samples had been executed. Now the system was scanned with each program. The result of the detection / cleaning rate could be measured by differences between snapshots of the according images..

Result of the infected system rescue test:

The failing programs were not able to detetect / remove at least two of the samples. For detailed information please visit the test page.

This year’s Epsilon winner is a-squared Anti-Malware!

That award winning was not only based on our efforts, but also on the massive support of the a-squared Anti-Malware user community.

Thank you very much!

The prize includes:

• A piece of art by an European artist and a winners certificate.
   
• 200 Euro in cash. Emsisoft will donate that amount to the SOS Children’s Villages organization that was founded in Austria.
   
• Press coverage of our products.
   
• Entry to the Hall of Fame which means free full access for the winner only to future ESWCs.

Here’s a short explanation of the Epsilon banner from the ESWC website:

Epsilon is the fifth letter of the Greek alphabet and the Phoenician Word for sun derives from that root. An astronomer knows that there is a constellation in space called (Lambda)-Epsilon which we can see at the right hand side. So the Epsilon Award is a combination of Excellency, craftsmanship and visionary ability. These are characteristics of an outstanding programmer and a piece of true software art.

Which is Better? Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware vs. a-squared Free

Her test results:

a-squared Free won in the major categories!

• Malware Detection – Winner: a-squared Free
  Of 100 malware samples, a-squared Free found 92, Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware only 58.
   
• Removal of Detected Malware Samples – Winner: a-squared Free
  a-squared Free was able to remove all detected samples without the need for a system restart.
   
• Performance – Scanning – Winner: a-squared Free
  a-squared Free finished a full scan of the system drive in 29 minutes, Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware took 1 hour and 24 minutes.
   
• Options and Feature – Winner: a-squared Free
  a-squared Free lets you run a quick, smart, custom, right-click, silent, commandline and deep system scans.

Trojans/Backdoors: 398,951
Windows Viruses: 8,864
Worms: 61,928
Adware/Spyware: 48,552
Rootkits/Exploits: 10,736
Other Malware: 25,860 

That ensures a representative mix of current malware types that is similar to a ”in-the-wild” malware mix. Test enviroment was a Windows XP machine with service pack 3. Here are the original test results:

We are proud to be able to defend our number one place!

a-squared Anti-Malware 4.5 was tested and won the coveted ProtectStar Award 2009!

Please check out the full 6-page detail review of a-squared Anti-Malware 4.5.

a-squared Anti-Malware was nominated for the Epsilon software award 2009. This award is given to the best software during the European Software Conference event, which is held once a year in Berlin, Germany.

The voting period just began and lasts until October 27, 2009, so please give us your vote!

We need your help to win! Please go to the voting website, scroll down to the bottom and click the Next button. Then select a-squared Anti-Malware from the list and submit your vote.

Thank you very much!

Quotes:

“Mamutu detected 100% of the tested Malware and blocked them.”

(+) Detects new pests too.

(+) Less false alerts with the community.

The following programs were tested:

- Avira Antivir Personal Free Antivirus 9.0
- Antivirus Software BitDefender 10
- Panda Cloud Antivirus Beta
- Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0
- Alwil Avast Antivirus Home 4.8
- AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition 8.5
- Emsi Software a-squared Free 4.5
- Comodo Internet Security 3.10
- PC Tools Antivirus Free Edition 6.0
- Clamwin Free Antivirus 0.95

The detection test results for a-squared Free:

- Wildlist-Malware on Demand: 100% detected – best in test!
- Worms: 99.99% detected – best in test!
- Backdoors: 99.98% detected – best in test!
- Bots: 99.81% detected – best in test!
- Trojans: 99.95% detected – best in test!
- 5 active nasties: 100% detected – best in test!
- Heuristic (1 week without updates): 63.56% detected – best in test!
- Heuristic (2 weeks without updates): 52.72% detected – number 2 in test
- Ad- and Spyware: 99.57% detected – best in test!

Full quote of their conclusion:

The Good

Although it brings to the table a plethora of options and fine tuning settings, a-squared is easy to manage by any average user. Its detection rate was over 98% and the flexibility in letting you decide upon online threats is to be fully appreciated.

The initial wizard can help you set up the entire application while the main screen gives way to fine tuning options in order to customize the way it protects your system. For each app on the computer you can create rules to restrict their performance or receive alerts when suspicious behavior is detected.

The various layers of protection can be enabled/disabled at will and all a-squared activity is logged for later reference. Scheduling system is very well thought, offering the chance to plan scans at specific times, dates and with a certain frequency, as well as define a start and end interval.

In order to reduce the amount of alerts, community knowledge can kick in and decide for you, according to your pre-configuration.

The Bad

Surf Protection alerts can be quite annoying, especially if you’re in the habit of roaming the less-known paths of the web. If tracking cookies are okay to block, with hosts things are different and many users may feel the urge to disable surf protection.

The Truth

a-squared managed to score high in our tests and prove that it can be a great ally against the cyber threats. It is easy to handle and the help file thoroughly explains every option in the program.

Background Guard can easily help you monitor any application for suspicious activity, as well as deflect malware-like activities on your computer.

Each program launched on the system can be scanned upon execution in order to make sure that its activity is benign. Alert system is flexible enough to let you automatically create a rule for the notifications you receive and thus reduce the amount of pop-up messages displayed.

EDITOR’S RATINGS: User Interface: Features: Ease of use: Pricing/Value: Overall:

Methodology:

The MRG testers have installed and tested 25 different security solutions to see if they can prevent virus infections. From pure antivirus over firewalls with antivirus features to full internet security suites. To make the test as representative as possible, they have executed 60 different nasties. All samples of malware used in this test came from infected machines, samples were collected in August 2009.

The test results:

Only less than 50% of the tested security products were able to protect the test system.

a-squared Anti-Malware has detected all malware samples!

On request, MRG told us that a-squared Anti-Malware was the only product which was able to detect all samples purely based on signature detection. The behavior blocker part was not even needed to prevent the infections.

The tables shows: Program tested, Amount of samples blocked, Amount of Samples missed, Passed or Failed the test.

Key facts:

• 23 well known antivirus products in test.
• 3132 Malware samples to be scanned.

Test results:

• Emsi Software’s a-squared Anti-Malware and Tall Emu’s Online Armor Personal Firewall ++ both missed only 3 samples, resulting in the first place in test!
• Of the missed 3 samples, a-squared Anti-Malware was able to catch 2 while dynamic testing (samples were started to see if the software can prevent infection).
   
• With only 1 missed sample, a-squared Anti-Malware’s total detection rate is 99.97%!

These were the candidates:

- Avira AntiVir Premium Version: 9.0.0.441
- a-squared Anti-Malware Version: 4.5.0.19
- avast! Professiona Edition Version: 4.8.1335
- Kaspersky Anti-Virus 2010 Version: 9.0.0.463
- G Data AntiVirus 2010 Version: 20.0.1.1
- COMODO Internet Security Version: 3.10.102363.531
- ESET NOD32 Antivirus System Version: 4.0.437
- Norton AntiVirus 2009 Version: 16.5.0.134
- AVG Anti-Virus Professional Edition: 8.5.406/1617
- Dr.Web anti-virus Version: 5.00.1.08030

Only 2 of 10 candidates passed the test:

a-squared Anti-Malware and Avira AntiVir!

Please check out the MRG website for more details: http://malwareresearchgroup.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=47

Additional note:

On request of Emsi Software, they have tested Mamutu 2.0 using the same samples. The result is stunning:

Even without any Malware signatures, Mamutu 2.0 blocked all samples too!

They wrote:

- 100% detection on the In-The-Wild test.

- Very good detection on less known viruses and trojans.

- Selfprotection is working efficiently.

- False alert rate is significantly lower compared with previous versions.

Conclusion:

(+) Very high detection rate

(+) Little false alerts

(+) Good self protection

(-) The user has to decide by himself on alert windows

The tool has been improved significantly, works 100% as it should and proves best detection.

On a scale from 1 (best) to 6 (worst), a-squared Anti-Malware was rated with a very good 2.0!

Trojans/Backdoors – 468,850
Windows Viruses - 12,134
Worms – 64,358
Adware/Spyware – 58,224
Rootkits/Exploits – 11,058
Other Malware – 24,800

Samples were gatherered between 2008 and 2009 and represent a typical spread ratio of each individual malware group.

Testresults

The table shows the program tested, the amount of malware samples (all of the categories above) that were detected and removed.

- 61.7% Trojans
- 22.9% Backdoors
- 14.2% Worms
- 0.7% Rootkits
- 0.5% Viruses

In static testing (found by the disk scanner), a-squared Anti-Malware 4.5 missed 6 samples, which means a detection rate of 99.83%.

PCSL tested the missed 6 samples by starting them to see how much of them can be blocked by the a-squared Anti-Malware Guard. The result:

a-squared Anti-Malware missed only 1 malware sample!!!

That means the best total detection rate of 19 antivirus products!

Total detection rate results in detail: 

Project details: On Demand scan test

Operating System used in this test: Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3

Total number of programs used in this test: 18

Malware samples used in this test: 395.844

Malware categories used in this test and the amount of samples in each category :

Windows/Macro Viruses- 18.696

Trojans/Backdoors- 243.811

Worms/Rootkits- 86.634

Adware/Spyware- 46.703

 All details can be reviewed here: Test #18

Read all details on SSUpdater.com

Operating System used in this test: Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3

Total number of programs used in this test: 18

Malware samples used in this test: 30

All the samples used should be detected by all the participants in this test.

All the samples used are wide spread and no “unknown” variants have been used.

List of Malware samples used in this test:

Adware.Win32.Cinmus.hen

Adware.Win32.Virtumonde.qpm

Backdoor.Win32.Bifrose.zbx

Backdoor.Win32.BlackHole.d

Backdoor.Win32.Hupigon.efjs

Backdoor.Win32.Poison.oo

Backdoor.Win32.Singu.bt

Backdoor.Win32.Sinowal.bq

FraudTool.Win32.Agent.b

Hoax.Win32.Renos.vark

Net.Worm.Win32.Kolab.baq

Rootkit.Win32.Clbd.kr

Trojan.Win32.Buzus.jio

Trojan.Win32.Delf.hjd

Trojan.Win32.Inject.afm

Trojan.Win32.Midgare.gga

Trojan.Win32.Monder.dtn

Trojan.Win32.Monderb.hrf

Trojan.Win32.Qhost.kng

Trojan.Win32.VB.jiq

Trojan.Clicker.Win32.Small.kj

TrojanDownloader.FakeAlert.wr

TrojanDownloader.Win32.Agent.bbkf

TrojanDownloader.Win32.CodecPack.ml

TrojanDownloader.Win32.Zlob.wg

TrojanDropper.Win32.Mudrop.cy

TrojanSpy.Win32.Delf.dq

TrojanSpy.Win32.Zbot.dmz

TrojanSpy.Win32.VB.axg

Virus.Win32.Virut.bv

The Table shows the name of the program used, how many points the program got and the final result.



Product
Points
Result


a-squared
30
System Rescued


Avast
30
System Rescued


Avira
30
System Rescued


AVG
30
System Rescued


BitDefender
30
System Rescued


COMODO
30
System Rescued


ClamAV
26
Failed


Dr.Web
23
Failed


eScan
30
System Rescued


F-Secure
30
System Rescued


G DATA
30
System Rescued


Kaspersky
30
System Rescued


McAfee
28
Failed


NOD32
24
Failed


Norman
27
Failed


Norton
30
System Rescued


Sophos
29
Failed


Twister
28
Failed




 

Read on here for testing methodology and details.

Quote:

From the SSUpdater Forum:

Read all details on SSUpdater.com

a-squared Anti-Malware 4.0.0.14
Ikarus virus.utilities T3 1001034
Kaspersky Internet Security 2009 8.0.0.454(a,b)
Kingsoft Internet Security 2008 2008.9.8.18
Trend Micro AntiVirus plus AntiSpyware 2008 8.910-1002
Twister Anti-TrojanVirus V7 R3 7.3.1.23211

Total Detection Summary: 1979 Malware Samples

1. a-squared: 1970: 99.56%
2. Ikarus: 1968: 99.44%
3. Kaspersky: 1948: 98.43%
4. Twister: 1917: 96.87% 
5. Trend Micro: 1823: 92.12%
6. Kingsoft: 1686: 85.19%

Read all details about this antivirus test here.

Results

Analysis

Donna, thanks for testing these products!